salvatore ferragamo italy website, Salvatore Ferragamo, Women at ferragamo.com
In Protection Of Adults Wearing Flip Flops
Slate’s Dana Stevens really does hate flip-flops. Last Wednesday, the film critic took the opportunity a “lull between huge summer time movie releases” afforded her and completely blasted the things. And though I must congratulate Stevens for the very act of dedicating almost 1,500 very nicely written phrases to Havaianas-hating, she is missing the point of the footwear altogether. Virtually each challenge she has with flip-flops is part of what makes them great in the primary place. In one in every of her particularly eloquent “tirades” about flip-flops, Stevens writes:
“But we’re not here to debate the footwear decisions of impoverished villagers, simply-showered athletes, or Jimmy Buffett strumming his six-string on his front porch in Margaritaville. We’re speaking about grown adults in affluent societies — folks presumably in possession of at the least one pair of actual shoes — who see match to navigate the grimy sidewalks of large cities shod only in a loosely flapping, half-inch-thick slip of rubber. Those people — you, if you’re among them — have to face the reality that you are, in essence, going barefoot, and it’s grossing the remainder of us out.”
Right here, Stevens misses one of the central traits of flip-flops. They are the anti-shoe. The very casualness that Stevens so hates about them is their greatest quality. Whereas we can’t all be riding dolphins “On a Boat” instead of riding the subway, we will all dream of the alternatives to the every day grind. The “schlapp!” noise that, a lot to the author’s chagrin, accompanies every flip-flop’s step down a flight of stairs is the sound of pedal — and private — freedom. Inform me, Stevens, does Ferragamo make GLOW In the dark PAC-MAN loafers Didn’t think so.
Furthermore, her indictment of flip-flops implies they’re for unemployed slobs who care little for neither style nor arch help. They might not be haute couture, but they will still go for a reasonably penny. And a few of them come with bottle openers.
Stevens then goes on to commit what’s in my mind salvatore ferragamo italy website a cardinal sin by putting flip-flops below Tevas and Crocs on the good Chain of Shoe Being. I’m sorry, but unless you occur to be in a canoe or are too young to get a learner’s permit, neither Tevas nor Crocs should ever encompass your toes. Better to topic your self to “broken glass, unfastened nails at construction sites, wads of gum, swimming pools of motor oil, piles of canine poop, puddles of human effluvia” (yikes) by going barefoot than put them on.
I will concede that going for even somewhat bit extra protection — TOMS and boat shoes come to thoughts — would keep you away from the aforementioned checklist of actually disgusting stuff you would possibly (actually) run into on metropolis streets. There’s nothing unsuitable with simply considering ft are gross, which seems to be the unifying theme of Stevens’s article. Nor do I counsel you present up to just about any place of work in them (however fortunate you if you can get away with it). Nevertheless, although flip-flops in all probability are a podiatric catastrophe, so are the “across-the-foot ‘slide’” sneakers that Stevens touts as alternate options. Most of her gripes with them might be resolved with simply slightly widespread sense from flip-flop wearers.
In targeting flip-flops alone as “foot robes,” Stevens underestimates their value in rebellion in opposition to the standard shoe. Ridding ourselves of flip-flops is just one more step toward a society filled with Males in Gray Flannel Fits. Who must stroll backwards anyway